Kristof wrote this article to help inform people, that believe that sweatshops are only a negative attribute in developing countries, to realize that sweatshops has many beneficial benefits. This aids Kristof views of sweatshops and allows the readers to be more aware of the dangerous condition of not having a job in a factory.
Many arguments against sweatshops are that labor standards can improve wages and working condition, but it only has a larger impact on productions costs that companies are trying to pare. He then ends his article of a little girl wearing scandalous brand shirt covered in filth searching for trash with her little sister with a missing hand when she was hit by a truck.
The article then presents quotes from people who live these areas that explains that working in sweatshops is a dream of their because it would bring in a steady source of income for their family.
Then Kristof gives the audience a surprise that increasing sweatshops can help reduce this type of lifestyle. Kristof then transitions into countering labor standards about how they only are helpful for a few countries, but having sweatshops be created in more capital-intensive countries will help those countries tremendously.
It is sometimes not as used in columns about politics, but it is used mostly in columns about foreign policy. He also says that most people, even in the National Rifle Association agree that there should be a universal background check for anyone trying to buy a gun.
Kristof uses these events to create sympathy for his cause; many of these children rather be working in factories because it provides a safe environment for children to work in.
Kristof backs up his claim Rhetorical analysis nicholas kristof using an example from the State of New York, who banned the magazines of guns holding more than seven bullets, but did not infer that most guns are unable to have magazines with seven bullets or less.
Kristof claims that the reason so many people die of gun violence is not because we suffer from lunatics and criminals, but that of a failure to regulate guns.
He used logos in these column to persuade the reader. Since the elections process is going on right now he has been writing about the candidates and disproving some of the claims that each one of them made and the claims that people have formed about each candidate.
After sharing quotes of the families that are living there, Kristof continues that children often scavenge for anything recyclable, but these children have a risk for being killed or injured. Throughout the article, Kristof presents many stories of children scavenging in filth to help provide for their families are often killed or gravely injured.
In articles about the presidential debate he uses logos by giving a lot of facts or past events that help support his claim. In articles about foreign policy he normally uses pathos to pull in the emotions of the reader in order to persuade them to be more underrstnading about the idea of refugees.
He argues that liberals sometimes babble on about the danger of guns but do not really know all of the statistics. The author displays his credibility by briefly mentioning that he has lived in Asia for a few years to witness several of the hardships of the citizens to obtain jobs.
I feel that we do not need to get rid of guns in all, but we need to not allow guns to get in the hands of the wrong people and that will always be the challenge. The better method of setting up sweatshops is to operate nations that has capital-intensive factories. These images of children covered in dust and bleeding is incredible powerful when using in a opinion based column, because it shows the reader what is really like in these countries.
The context of the article would be that many people presume that many sweatshops is a sign of a stigma because of many companies create cheap sweatshops and hire cheap workers to increase their profits.
Even though it seems as if Kristof has changed his view about gun control, he has not, but gives a more broad view of what is actually going on. As you can see this law does not do anything but create a hassle for people and make them mad.
Kristof with the purpose of enlightening people across the nation that sweatshops are an essential to any developing country. Kristof organized his article by introducing an image of Dante-like hell with mountains of garbage with children searching for old plastic items to sell to recyclers, and transitions into stating that many families live in this trash area.
In some articles he uses pathos and in all articles he uses logos mixed with some ethos. But one flaw of the article was that it lacked credibility because Kristof mentions only once that he was in Asia for years, but all these facts could be theorized by him and many of his stories seem very generic, and all the same: How he uses pathos is primarily talking about death and mortality of people all of the world.
After this he provides the reader with enough facts and evidence that would persuade the reader that global warming is real.Sep 24, · Nicholas Kristof, a talented columnist for the New York Times, has won many prizes and awards such as the Anne Frank award and the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary.
In his works, “Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?,” and “Some Inconvenient Gun Facts for Liberals,” he argues that there should be a more strict. Sep 24, · Rhetorical Analysis of "Where Sweatshops are a Dream" Rhetorical Situation "Where Sweatshops are a Dream" is an essay written by Nicholas D.
Kristof with the purpose of enlightening people across the nation that sweatshops are an essential to any developing country.
Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Rhetorical Analysis Nicholas Kristof. Sep 24, · Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn article, adapted from their book Thunder From the East: Portrait of a Rising Asia. Rhetorical Analysis ; Book Review; Responsibility to Protect; Human Rights Day; Nicholas Kristof has a valid and out of the box argument on why sweatshops are beneficial.
Most of you are probably thinking, “Who is this man and why in the world does he think sweatshops would ever be someone’s dream?” Nicholas Kristof spent several. How a New York Times columnist rewrote opinion mint-body.com York Times writer.
1. How a New York Times columnist rewrote opinion journalism Nicholas Kristof is one of seven recipients of.Download