Mainly because of his work Il Principe " The Prince "he considered one of the most important political philosophers of modern times. One also can not be loved. He claims that those who are most fit to rule are people who are limpid and fluid in their governing style.
According to him, one should say one thing just to make the people happy, and do another.
Furthermore, he claims that if people remain occupied by their daily affairs, and if government is ran smoothly, the power of a ruler is better guarded than not, especially if they favor the needs of their people as opposed to those of the nobility.
In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power.
He believes that people are generally bad and greedy, so they will take whatever you give them. Machiavelli believes that the prince should have total control and do anything to gain power; however, Lao-Tzu desires a political system in which everything runs its own course. What makes man greedy is overemphasis on material objects, and if you let a man go free in nature, he will be good.
Instead of holding power and forcing rules, Lao-Tzu wishes to teach simplicity, patience, and compassions. He believes one should only keep his word if it is for the benefit of the nation. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline.
This section contains words approx. He believes that man in a state of nature is generally good and not greedy. This is much like our cold war with the USSR and the new lands to conquer would be anything Communist.
Machiavelli believed that in strong government control by a prince who acted more in terms of practicality and maintaining power than through moral principles. It was a time of constant change alliances, mercenaries, crossed over to the enemy without warning when the power, lasted for several weeks, collapsed and replaced by a new one.
Lao-Tzu is not exactly polar opposite of Machiavelli, although he is close. To Lao Tzu, this veil can be useful because it can better ensure that people will always revere their leader, especially if they rule subtly by keeping their methods of control a secret.
I believe he gets this idea from the fear of God; no one is supposed to question God because he is so feared, and in the same sense, no one should question a strong leader.Comparing the Political Theories of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli: Arguments in Favor of Political Rights and Fair Leadership.
In this paper, we will compare and contrast the similarities and differences between Lao-tzu and Machiavelli. This section presents a comparison of different methods on how to become a great leader between the elements of war, mercy, and techniques.
Lao-Tzu’s, “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching,” along with Niccolo Machiavelli’s, “The Qualities of the Prince,” both discuss multiple characteristics that a leader should possess to be a successful. Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times.
Lao - tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived years after Lao -tzu's time, author of Prince.
Lao Tzu has many views that are in great opposition to those of Machiavelli. Comparison of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli specifically for you.
for only $ $/page. Machiavelli’s story ; Niccolo Machiavelli and his influences on modern day leaders ; Fahrenheit Allusion to Machiavelli ; We have essays on the following topics that.
Although similarities between Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu may be difficult to detect, their views are both very extreme. Machiavelli believes that the prince should have total control and do anything to gain power; however, Lao-Tzu desires a political system in which everything runs its own course.Download